72 Thunderbird Formula w/twin 165hp Mercs
Tags:
Looks great.. why the bulkhead splitting the fuel tank area?
I have recored the entire fwd deck on my 64 233, now raising cockpit sole 4". Have moved hyd trim units and batteries fwd almost to main bulkhead. Cutting weight as much as possible.
Power is 2 3.0 MC's.
Making entire sole watertight, Gasketed hatches, 3" scuppers with shut off valves. 2" regular scuppers. Have a 6" dam gasketed to sole inside engine box so water has to go out the 3" scuppers before it gets over the 6" dam.
This hull was cored above the chines, and kept in dry storage for 50 years.. only damage was balsa deck cores from cleats, anchor chocks, pulpit mounts. All hardware mounts are now backed by meranti ply, not balsa.
Goal is light, economy fuel burn, capable of taking green water and putting it back where it came from.
Arthur, thanks for checking in, a 1964 233 that's awesome post some pics. As far as the bulkhead on the front and rear of the fuel tank bay that is how it was built. The original tank was about 110 gallons and 6 feet long. The new tank is only 4 feet long and about 67 gallons so I had an extra 2 feet of space between the main stringers so I made 2 compartments. One is a fish ice box that is a little larger then the other compartment which will be storage for extra anchor and lines. The old tank bay had 1/2" plywood bulkhead front and rear but the area was not sealed very well and the tank was encased in foam and as a result of the moisture intrusion over the years the tank was pitted and leaking. The new tank bay is sealed very well. It has been sealed for months and I have washed down the boat several times with a garden hose spraying water everywhere. Monday I opened the inspection port I put in the rear bulk head so I could check the inside bottom rear part of the tank and compartment, it was dry as a bone. I am expecting some moisture in there as a result of condensation from the temperature variance in the fuel when I fill up but I don't think that will be an issue, I hope. As far as the weight I went the opposite way you are going. I added beefier stringers, bulkheads, deck. These twin in line 6, 165hp push this tub pretty well not a speed boat by no means but when it was running I could do about 46mph with just me and 20 gallons of fuel and the standard gear I would have on board. The cool part was I could then load it down with 4 divers and all our dive gear and 12 tanks enough for 3 dives and still be able to get up to about 42mph WOT. As far as fuel economy its a boat and never cared too much about GPH. Good luck on your resto and again post some pics.
© 2024 Created by David. Powered by